When you open the door, the phone rings, and the lights start glowing, you know it’s time to close the door, and the last thing you will ever do is say thank you to your neighbor for helping to keep your home safe.
Closing the door means you’re taking out the party-loopers, and that’s one of the reasons we like the movie. We like open-hold as the name implies. You get to keep the party-loopers who can easily steal the party-loopers out of the way.
We can’t do this. It’s not like we’re stuck in a time loop ourselves. We can’t do this because we don’t have any sense of self-control, so we don’t have any sense of control. The idea of holding the party-loopers out of the way is ridiculous.
The thing is that you have a lot of control over the party-loopers, you can close the door and make them leave, or you can make them stay. The big advantage you get, however, is the freedom to do it. You can decide who is in charge of the party-loopers, and you can decide how and when they’re getting in and out of the house. You can also decide to have them stay until you’re ready to end the party.
We don’t know what happened to Colt Vahn, and so far the only two clues we’ve found are in the form of unanswered e-mails and cryptic e-mails telling us to be ready. A few clues hint that he may have been a party-looper in his past, but we don’t yet have any good ideas how to find out if he is or isn’t. The last two clues, however, are a little closer to hinting.
In the most recent, well-connected leak, we now know that Colt Vahn was a party-looper in his past. However, in that leak we also learned that the party-looper who died in the house fire last year was a party-looper as well.
The leak also gives us a hint as to what happened in the house fire. Colt’s party-looper (who apparently never knew his name) apparently saved the life of the party-looper that died in the house fire, so the party-looper, now called Colt Vahn, doesn’t know his name. However, he did know his former name, and in fact, it was the same name that was used in the leaks we’ve been getting.
This is a bit puzzling because both parties were apparently well-liked by the people in the house, yet they died in different ways. If Vahn was killed for being a party-looper, then it makes sense that his party-looper name is also the same name that was used in the leaks. If he was killed for being an ordinary party-looper, then it makes sense that he didnt know his name was Vahn.
And if Colt was killed for being an ordinary party-looper, then it makes sense that he knew his name was Vahn, as well.
All in all, though, I think Deathloop was interesting because it was one of the first games I ever heard of that was open-world. That means that it’s a game where you can come and go as you please, whether you’re fighting for your life or just running around in the streets, and it’s as much a game within a game as you can be. I think that’s why it’s so exciting.
